Search for: All records

Impulsivity has been proposed as a key driver of obesity. However, evidence linking impulsivity and obesity has relied on the study of individual factors, with limited account for the urban attributes of obesogenic environments. Here, we investigate the relationship between obesity and impulsivity through urban scaling and causal discovery. For 915 cities in the United States of America, we study the prevalence of obesity in adults, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, and relevant urban features. We observe sublinear scaling of obesity and ADHD with population size, these disorders being less prevalent in larger cities. By applying a causal discovery tool to the deviations of cities from the urban scaling laws, we identify an influence of ADHD on obesity, moderated by lifestyle. The strength of these associations is confirmed by individual-level data on a cohort of 19,333 children, wherein we observe that ADHD modulates obesity both directly and indirectly. 

Ongoing efforts seek to unravel theories that can make simple, quantitative and reasonably accurate predictions of the morphological adaptive changes that arise with the size variation. Yet, relatively scant attention has been directed towards lateral undulatory locomotion. In the current study, we explore: (i) the constraints imposed by the variation of length and mass in viscous and dry friction environments on the cost of transport (COT) of lateral undulatory locomotion and (ii) the role of the body, environment and input oscillations in such an intricate interplay. In a dry friction environment, minimum COT correlates with stiffer and longer bodies, higher frictional anisotropy and angular amplitudes greater than approximately 10^o. Conversely, a viscous environment favours flexible long bodies, higher frictional anisotropy and angular amplitudes lower than approximately 30^o. In both environments, optimizing mass and maintaining low angular frequencies minimizes COT. Our conclusions are applicable only in the low-Reynolds-number regime, and it is essential to consider the interdependence of parameters when applying the generalized results. Our findings highlight musculoskeletal and biomechanical adaptations that animals may use to mitigate the consequences of size variation and to meet the energetic demands of lateral undulatory locomotion. These insights enhance foundational biomechanics knowledge while offering practical applications in robotics and ecology. 

Abstract Firearm injuries are a leading cause of death in the United States, surpassing fatalities from motor vehicle crashes. Despite this significant public health risk, Americans continue to purchase firearms in large quantities. Commonly cited drivers of firearm acquisition include fear of violent crime, fear of mass shootings, and panic-buying. Additionally, advocacy groups’ activity on social media may capitalize on emotions like fear and influence firearm acquisition. The simultaneous effects of these variables have not been explored in a causal framework. In this study, we aim to elucidate the causal roles of media coverage of firearm laws and regulations, media coverage of mass shootings, media coverage of violent crimes, and the Twitter activity of anti- and proregulation advocacy groups in short-term firearm acquisition in the United States. We collect daily time series for these variables from 2012 to 2020 and employ the PCMCI+ framework to investigate the causal structures among them simultaneously. Our results indicate that the Twitter activity of antiregulation advocacy groups directly drives firearm acquisitions. We also find that media coverage of firearm laws and regulations and media coverage of violent crimes influence firearm acquisition. Although media coverage of mass shootings and online activity of proregulation organizations are potential drivers of firearm acquisition, in the short term, only the lobbying efforts of antiregulation organizations on social media and specific media coverage appear to influence individuals’ decisions to purchase firearms. 

Racial homophily refers to the tendency of individuals to associate with others of the same racial or ethnic background. A recent study found no evidence of racial homophily in responses to mass shooting data visualizations. To increase the likelihood of detecting an effect, we redesigned the experiment by replacing bar charts with anthropographics and expanding the sample size. In a crowdsourced study (N=720), we showed participants a pictograph of mass shooting victims in the United States, with victims from one of three racial groups (Hispanic, Black, or White) highlighted. Each participant was assigned a visualization highlighting either their own racial group or a different racial group, allowing us to assess the influence of racial concordance on changes in affect (emotion). We found that, across all conditions, racial concordance had a modest but significant effect on changes in affect, with participants experiencing greater negative affect change when viewing visualizations highlighting their own race. This study provides initial evidence that racial homophily can emerge in responses to data visualizations, particularly when using anthropographics. 

In the realm of urban science, scaling laws are essential for understanding the relationship between city population and urban features, such as socioeconomic outputs. Ideally, these laws would be based on complete datasets; however, researchers often face challenges related to data availability and reporting practices, resulting in datasets that include only the highest observations of the urban features (top-k). A key question that emerges is: Under what conditions can an analysis based solely on top-kobservations accurately determine whether a scaling relationship is truly superlinear or sublinear? To address this question, we conduct a numerical study that explores how relying exclusively on reported values can lead to erroneous conclusions, revealing a selection bias that favors sublinear over superlinear scaling. In response, we develop a method that provides robust estimates of the minimum and maximum potential scaling exponents when only top-kobservations are available. We apply this method to two case studies involving firearm violence, a domain notorious for its suppressed datasets, and we demonstrate how this approach offers a reliable framework for analyzing scaling relationships with censored data. 

Despite almost a century of research on energetics in biological systems, we still cannot explain energy regulation in social groups, like ant colonies. How do individuals regulate their collective activity without a centralized control system? What is the role of social interactions in distributing the workload amongst group members? And how does the group save energy by avoiding being constantly active? We offer new insight into these questions by studying an intuitive compartmental model, calibrated with and compared to data on ant colonies. The model describes a previously unexplored balance between positive and negative social feedback driven by individual activity: when activity levels are low, the presence of active individuals stimulates inactive individuals to start working; when activity levels are high, however, active individuals inhibit each other, effectively capping the proportion of active individuals at any one time. Through the analysis of the system’s stability, we demonstrate that this balance results in energetic spending at the group level growing proportionally slower than the group size. Our finding is reminiscent of Kleiber’s law of metabolic scaling in unitary organisms and highlights the critical role of social interactions in driving the collective energetic efficiency of group-living organisms.